Why and how has the evolutionary balance between freedom and
responsibility in the western tradition been undermined?
The original values and institutions of the
tradition were subjected to challenge, notwithstanding
the overall wealth and development that the system and
the market economy have generated. How and why has
this happened. Some of the tensions engendered by
the challenge are analysed above.
The original values and institutions of the
western democratic order can accommodate some of the
concerns for, and the analysis of, human problems and
suffering which move the reformists. The tensions
arise because: (1) the reformist ideas and policies
often are based on unachievable standards and an
absence of understanding of "common sense", the
rationale of the original tradition and human
interaction, and (2) the emphasis on the power of law to
achieve those ends.
The supporter of the original tradition may often
agree with the reformist in his analysis of problems
but would argue that an attempt to use law made by
imperfect humans and administered by imperfect
bureaucrats and judges is often counter productive.
Thus, for example, a supporter of freedom may be
equally as concerned as a regulationist about
discrimination against women but would see the need for
education rather than regulation. He would doubt the wisdom
of special legislation (targets, quotas) and
suggest the better enforcement of the general law
because, legislation in such situations will lead to
discrimination and create more problems than it solves.
Equality of opportunity (not equality of
outcome) and provision for the genuinely
underprivileged are within the rationale of the
original tradition. The emphasis of the reformists
is no longer on merely providing for the really poor
and reducing inequality. The emphasis is no longer on
extending avenues for equality of opportunity, but is
directed towards equality as a goal - towards providing
equality of outcome. The movement is for equality
and for the elimination of economic and social
privilege, disparity and exploitation, which has very
fundamental implications for freedom and enterprise.
This is accompanied by the resounding clichetic
phrases and arguments which accompany the egalitarian
message, and the envy and hatred of success, capitalism
and wealth, even when privilege is based on effort
and ability.
The fundamental problems in recent decades has
been the attempt by the reform tradition to provide
legal solutions for problems to which there are no
legal solutions or which cannot be adequately dealt
with by the legal system.
The consequences of the challenge have led to:
Space does not permit the exploration of all these issues. Some of them have surfaced during the above analysis. The following analysis focuses on some other aspects of why and how the traditional western system was undermined and has declined.
| « Next » | « Democratic Tradition » | « Topics Concerning Australia » | « Home » |